Additional State Protections: Torts, BIPA, and the AADC Act
States add protection via constitutions, common-law privacy torts, and contract theories. Illinois's BIPA (2008) requires notice and consent for biometrics and has a private right of action; California's Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (2022) protects users under 18.
How this supports CIPP/US study
Use this lesson to connect a privacy programme decision with the relevant regulator, duty or enforcement route. Continue with the CIPP/US exam questions.
- State constitutions may expressly recognize a right to privacy
- Common-law privacy torts: intrusion upon seclusion, appropriation of name/likeness, publicity given to private life, and false light
- Contract theories - e.g., breach of a promise of confidentiality by a physician or financial institution
BIPA (Illinois, 2008) requires notice and informed consent before using biometric data and has a private right of action - the source of major class actions since 2015. California's Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (2022), modeled on the UK's, covers online services likely accessed by children under 18 and requires high-privacy default settings.
COPPA protects children under 13; California's Age-Appropriate Design Code Act protects users under 18. The exam will tempt you to swap these thresholds.
Key terms - quick answers
What is “Privacy torts”?
What is “BIPA”?
What is “Age-Appropriate Design Code Act”?
Sources and study method
This independent lesson uses active recall, spaced retrieval and scenario practice. Read the full study method.