Intercepting Communications: Wiretap Act and ECPA
The Wiretap Act and ECPA generally prohibit intercepting wire, oral, and electronic communications. Two workplace exceptions: consent (party or one party consents) and the ordinary course of business. Listening to a purely personal call risks liability; many states require all-party consent to record calls.
How this supports CIPP/US study
Use this lesson to identify the disclosure, workplace or cross-border rule that changes the result in a fact pattern. Continue with the CIPP/US study plan.
The Wiretap Act and ECPA generally prohibit intercepting wire communications (calls), oral communications (hidden bugs), and electronic communications (emails). Interception without an exception is a criminal offense with a private right of action.
- Consent exception - a party to the call, or one party who consents, permits interception
- exception - an employer providing the communication service may intercept in the normal course of business
Listening to an employee's purely personal call risks violating the wiretap laws. Because courts split on the breadth of 'ordinary course of business,' many employers rely on consent. State laws differ: some require one-party consent, others require all-party consent to record calls.
Key terms - quick answers
What is “Wiretap Act”?
What is “ECPA”?
What is “Ordinary course of business exception”?
Sources and study method
This independent lesson uses active recall, spaced retrieval and scenario practice. Read the full study method.